Some ecosystems rely on work groups; others have structures that include multiple boards; and some are far less structured. Leaders from Lancaster, Tulsa and Kansas City, all share information about how they have organized their work and communities.
Kansas City became the KC STEM Alliance through an evolution of existing Project Lead the Way and First Robotics partnerships pushed further with philanthropic support.
Ann Zimmerman, director of the KC STEM Alliance, recalls the history of the ecosystem and the evolution of its governance structure: “In 2006, we had multiple school districts implementing best practices. We did some strategic planning and realized we could create this umbrella organization over what was already happening to gain some synergy and scale; this would give us the opportunity to align learning and connect to industry.”
She explains that the Kauffman Foundation had been a major investor and helped enable the official formation of the ecosystem in 2012.
LISTEN TO THE DISCUSSION | VIEW THE WEBINAR
At First Our Ecosystem Just Convened Partners to Share Best Practices and Resources. by Building out Our Structure to Include an Advisory Board, We Were Able to Expand Capacity, Scale and Connect to Industry
The Lancaster STEM Alliance trajectory was aligned to strategic priorities from the start. “We have five strategic priorities that help us align under a common vision,”says Willonda McCloud of the Lancaster STEM Alliance. “The Alliance is made up of K-12 schools, informal learning organizations, universities and industry. The five priorities allow partners to find a place for their expertise and operationalize together.”
McCloud shares meetings are efficient, with the Alliance’s backbone organization, the Steinman Foundation, taking on the overall organization of the Alliance and the subgroups taking responsibility for their goals during subgroup meetings. “It keeps
partners engaged and coming back to the table,” says Willonda. “Each subgroup has a chair responsible for moving that work along as well. Establishing a process like this allows us to be respectful of people’s time and they know what to expect.”
We Launch Projects and Working Groups Where They Fit Naturally – Vision-Centric, Based on the Expertise in the Room and the Community Need
“It was a bit of a hot mess, but it was our hot mess,” Xan Black reveals the origin story of Tulsa’s Regional STEM Alliance. “Our design work with TIES in the beginning was instrumental. We put 60 partners in a room to discover and vet everything that was happening related to STEM in Tulsa, and equally important, what was not happening. Together, TRSA was formed, a ‘dynamic mesh network,’ with no hierarchy of authority, which was really important to the group. This was really the right course at that point because if one group had authority and been in charge of it, I think the other groups would have said, ‘Oh that’s a chamber thing or that’s a public-school thing or oh that’s a University of Tulsa thing,’ but we wanted it to be all people and all the groups had an equal voice.”
Our Network Was Designed in a Way That All Groups Had Equal Voices and Ownership in the Project, Which Allowed the Work to Progress Initially, TRSA started with a program manager and a part-time assistant program manager to serve the advisory council and Alliance, at large.
“Since that time thanks to our amazing partners in the regional STEM Alliance, our work has grown. This added more financial responsibility so in June 2018 we became a 501C-3,” Black says. “With that, came a more traditional hierarchy type of governance. So now we have a 25-member board of directors and five committees.”
Despite this shift, Black says the original vision and organization has actually remained constant. “All of the people that were originally in that room five years ago, are represented on our board. We still have an advisory council that meets quarterly so we still have that very grassroots voice presence in everything we do. Now we just have a BOD that take more fiduciary responsibility.”